Feeling much improved today and ready to get back to normal. I came across this YouTube commentary today in my remaining malaise:
You can say “I
am Rain Man” no matter what gender you are to try to pay homage to Baal so
that he will bless your life with fame, money, prosperity.
It’s the same
as, you know, Satan offered Jesus all the kingdoms of the world. He’s the god of
this world; he can give you all these riches and everything.
These people who have taken that offer—a lot of celebrities whether they’re basketball players, musicians, whatever—you’ll see them throw those signs up with their hands. The 666, the horns, the index fingers.
They’ll just sit there and flash them
back to back and you’re like, “What are they doing?” I’ve literally seen like
LeBron James or somebody, he’s not even looking at the camera. He’s just kind
of looking up and it’s real fast, flashing the signs. He’s giving allegiance just
like Christians would be praying, “God help me do this thing; speak through me.”
The more times
you can actually pay homage through symbols in whatever you do or say the more
it’s said that you are going to be blessed with fame and fortune. You call on
Rain Man, in reference to someone who offers abundance of blessings from above.
The Rain Man
found in hip-hop music is shown in videos by throwing money or having money
appear to be coming down from above. Rain Man, as we’re connecting the dots, is
Baphomet or the devil and they will use the words “rain,” “umbrella,” “ella”
and “a.” Those are like the key terms for you invoking Rain Man.
In the years
of Elijah, they were worshipping Baal and they were saying the rain came from
Baal. It’s interesting to see where this comes from and what it actually means.
*****
"Fire
and water must have made you their daughter," is a line from the famous
1970 tune Fire and Water. If you think about it, references to
fire and water in American songs are quite common. Of course, Satan's minions,
we know from the Bible, are huge fans of both.
When Jesus
Christ returns at the Second Coming, Zechariah 10:11 tells us, [11]
And he shall pass through the sea with affliction, and shall smite the waves in
the sea, and all the deeps of the river shall dry up: and the pride of Assyria
shall be brought down, and the sceptre of Egypt shall depart away.
Similarly,
Habakkuk 3 says, [9] Thy bow was made quite naked, according to the
oaths of the tribes, even thy word. Selah. Thou didst cleave the earth with
rivers.
[10]
The mountains saw thee, and they trembled: the overflowing of the water passed
by: the deep uttered his voice, and lifted up his hands on high.
[13] Thou wentest forth for the salvation of thy people, even for
salvation with thine anointed; thou woundedst the head out of the house of the
wicked, by discovering the foundation unto the neck. Selah.
“The ‘head out of the house of the wicked’ is the Antichrist,” explains Richard Jordan. “He’s the head of the satanic policy of evil and the judgment on the rivers . . .
“The cloaking effect in the rivers, where they’re trying to hide, and the Red Sea, the Dead Sea, have places where there are openings that go down into the heart of the earth into hell—places where some of Satan’s emissaries hide in these waters.
“When Christ comes back and judges these things, He’s not just pitching a hissy fit and being capricious; there’s a connection between the satanic program and that stuff.
“In Zechariah 10:11, Jesus Christ is literally assaulting the demonic forces of the Adversary and there’s that army and that fight.
“In Joel 2 we talked about that at great length. He’s come to put all of that away; He’s literally going to take the armies and artillery of the strongman and bind him and put an end to the conflict. The Second Coming of Christ settles the battle that started in Genesis 1.
*****
In the appendix notes about Tammuz at the end of his classic book (circa 1858), The Two Babylons, Alexander Hislop writes,
"Everywhere are the Zoroastrians, or fire-worshippers, called Gabrs. Now, Genesis 10:8 proves that Nimrod was the first of the Gabrs. As Zoroaster was head of the fire-worshippers, so Tammuz was evidently the same . . .
"1. In the first place, Tammuz and Adonis are proved to be the same divinity. Jerome, who lived in Palestine when the rites of Tammuz were observed, up to the very time when he wrote, expressly identifies Tammuz and Adonis in his commentary on Ezekiel, where the Jewish women are presented as weeping for Tammuz . . .
"2. Now, if Tammuz was Nimrod, the examination of the meaning of the name confirms the connection of Nimrod, with the first fire-worship, there needs no argument to show that, as the Chaldeans were the first who introduced the name and power of kings, and as Nimrod was unquestionably the first of these kings, and the first consequently, that bore the title of Moloch, or king, so it was in honor of him that the 'children were made to pass through the fire to Moloch.' But the intention of that passing through the fire was undoubtedly to purify . . .
"It is evident fire itself was worshipped as Tammuz, for it is called the 'Father that perfected all things.' In one respect this represented fire as the Creative god; but in another, there can be no doubt that it had reference to the 'perfecting' of men by 'purifying' them. And especially it perfected those whom it consumed. . . And this also, no doubt, reconciled the parents who actually sacrificed their children to Moloch, to the cruel sacrifice, the belief being cherished that the fire that consumed them also 'perfected' them, and made them meet for eternal happiness."
*****
Ezekiel 8 is a passage mentioning Tammuz: “Then said he unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen what the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, every man in the chambers of his imagery? for they say, The LORD seeth us not; the LORD hath forsaken the earth.
[14] Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.”
No comments:
Post a Comment