Bethany, in Scripture, is a little town down in
the southeast corner of the Mount of Olives, less than two miles from the city
of Jerusalem. It’s a suburb of very little consequence and one nobody knows much about; its only real claim to
fame is Mary, Martha and Lazarus live there.
“It’s fascinating that this is the place that Jesus goes to
perform THE hallmark miracle of His ministry—the resurrection of Lazarus,” says
Jordan. “No greater miracle did He do than that one and He doesn’t do it in
Jerusalem.
"You remember back in chapter 7 how His brothers wanted to go
to Jerusalem and show all His glory and do all this big stuff? Well, that’s
where the crowd was; that’s where the fame was. You know, if you want to get a
Pulitzer Prize or your name on a marquee, you go to Jerusalem.
*****
“Do you realize the Bible doesn’t mention any of the great cities
of the New Testament era? There were great wonderful cities in existence at the
time of Christ and the apostles but you don’t read about hardly any of them in
the Bible.
“Now, you read about Ephesus and ‘great is Diana of Ephesus.’ That's the temple in Acts 19 that was one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. But it’s
just sort of a side note in Acts about a more important story.
“The Bible’s a strange book of history. It’s a book of history, but
it focuses on the odd things. It’s not focusing on the big marquee places; it’s
focusing on places like Bethany because Jesus goes there to that seemingly
insignificant place to perform the hallmark miracle of His whole life.
“I think about that and that’s a
tremendous example of how He glorifies Himself, not in the glory of man, but in
the insignificance of man.
“He picks this little nothing of a place, as it were, as the place
of the final, conclusive proof of His identity as He’s preparing to surrender
Himself to death. This is a moment of great import in the life of Christ. But
He doesn’t do it on the stage of human history where the cameras are rolling.
*****
“Bethany is the town of the sisters Mary and Martha. In Luke 10,
you get introduced to them for the first time. This is a wonderful home. Luke 10:38-39 reads: ‘Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain
village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house.
[39] And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus'
feet, and heard his word.'
“It’s always good to receive Christ, but when you think about it in
the context of Luke 10, He’s being rejected everywhere He goes. Here’s a home
that receives Him. This is a home of Believers interested in hearing what Jesus
is teaching.
“Notice in John 11 how that John assumes the people he’s
writing to know who Mary is. That’s the reason, by the way, that Mary is placed
first in verse 11. Every other time Martha, Mary and Lazarus are all three mentioned
in the Bible, Martha is mentioned first. The reason, obviously, is because
people knew who Mary was. She’s the one who anointed Him and wiped His feet with
her hair.
“You can go to Mark 14 and read about it. One of the things Christ
said about her was that what she did would make her famous among the Believers
forever and obviously she was quite well-known.
“The passage reads: [6] And Jesus
said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a good work on me.
[7] For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will
ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.
[8] She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint
my body to the burying.
[9] Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be
preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be
spoken of for a memorial of her.
“So, this woman that does this is going to be well-known
everywhere. And that’s why in John 11:2 it says this is the Mary that did that.
It’s her home.
“But you notice that this account in Mark, and the parallel
account in Matthew 26, her name doesn’t appear. She’s sort of like that thing
in Philippians 4:3 when Paul says, ‘And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow,
help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and
with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life.’
“He doesn’t identify who his yokefellow is. He does talk about
Clement and Euodias and Syntyche but the true yokefellow, the one who was the
dearest to him, he doesn’t even mention his name, obviously because everybody
would know who that was.
“Matthew and Mark don’t put the name but John does. That’s sort of
the way the Book of John works. It’s fascinating the little details John adds
that the others leave out. For example, look at John 18:10: [10] Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high
priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus.
“You can go over to Matthew 26 and
Mark 14 and Luke 22 and you won’t read about the servant’s name, Malchus.
“It’s in John that you learn the
women who anointed Jesus was Martha and Lazarus’ sister, Mary. The Book of John
is talking about how ‘the light of the world has come,’ and little things like
that kind of come out in the light of that book. It’s sort of characteristic of
the way the Book of John operates.
*****
“There’s something else interesting about John 11:2. John assumed
his readers already knew the accounts in Mark 14 and Matthew 26. ‘This is the
woman you already knew about,’ he’s saying. If that’s true, that means Matthew
and Mark, at least, were written before the Book of John, because John assumes
they know all about Mary.
“Well, if the Book of John was written prior to the destruction of
Jerusalem in 70 AD, and Matthew and Mark are assumed to be written before John,
that puts all of them much earlier than what tradition wants to put them.”
*****
Personal
info: Once when I was in my mid-30s I attended a small party in San Francisco’s
North Beach neighborhood that was held by a 77-year-old Beatnik-generation woman who had become my friend through a mutual friend, also a former Beatnik.
I always remember how they laughed over the fact that my dad was, more or less,
kicked out as a missionary doctor in the Amazon jungles of Ecuador for drug use.
They saw this as some kind of weird badge of honor. I remember the people at
the party agreeing, “I would love to meet your dad. He sounds like a real
character.”
For
me, the “funny” part was I had just learned this information about my dad from the
year before. I spent my whole childhood on through my 20s not knowing my dad
was a habitual pill-popper! From what I now know, it was my dad’s drug use, in
part, that led him to become a missionary--something he paid his own way to do--in the first place. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment