From today’s headline story in the New York Post: “Researchers have found that a boat-shaped mound — long believed by the faithful to be Noah’s Ark — was most likely submerged under water during a devastating flood some 5,000 years ago, The Jerusalem Post reported.
“According to
the Bible, the dimensions of the vessel were ‘a length of three hundred cubits,
its width fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits,’ mirroring those of the
Durupinar formation, ‘and the ark rested … upon the mountains of Ararat.’
“New findings
have also shown that the formation was once submerged under water as soil
samples containing traces of clay-like materials, marine deposits and seafood
remnants were dated back to a time when the biblical floods are said to have
occurred, between 3,500 and 5000 years ago.
“Various
religious texts, including those touted by Christianity, Judaism and Islam, all
reference Noah and the ark, but scientists have yet to determine the
authenticity of the stories.
“Since its
discovery in 1948, many have theorized that the Durupinar formation is the fossilized
wood of Noah’s Ark.
“The reality
of these occurrences has continued to be a topic of debate between scientists
and scholars for centuries. However, recent research has pushed more experts to
believe the legend may be true.
“Researchers
involved in the project noted, ‘The evidence suggests that the story might have
a basis in reality.’ ”
*****
Luke 3: [36]
Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son
of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
This verse
says Noah was a real person, explains Richard Jordan. If Noah was a figment of
your imagination, then all of the people in the genealogy of Jesus Christ must
be figments of your imagination.
In this
passage, Noah is a historically reliable, real figure. If Jesus Christ was a
real historic figure, then Noah had to have been too.
So, when we
read about Noah and the Flood, we’re not reading about mythology--some story
just to give a moral meaning. We’re not reading about some dream or
hallucination. You’re reading about historic reality.
Noah is
mentioned eight times in the New Testament. Hebrews 11: [7] By faith
Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared
an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and
became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.
Notice the verse
begins and ends with the phrase “by faith.” That’s an interesting thing. Not
many verses in the Bible begin with the same two words they end with. Noah’s
faith is the big issue.
You know, you
have to appreciate the fact Noah’s an extremely important figure in human
history. If it wasn’t for Noah and his faith, there wouldn’t be any human race!
You’d have been exterminated in the Flood. Your ancestors would have been drowned
out and you wouldn’t be here today.
Here's an old post that garnered high readership and will have a new article tomorrow:
The last generations before the actual return of Christ to this earth will be characterized by godless masses of mockers who scoff at the preaching of His return.
“What is the measuring stick, the criteria, and the basis for such scoffing and rejection of the preaching of Christ’s return? It will be based on an unshakable trust in a philosophy of evolution that rests on the assumption of uniformitarianism. Remember this is the view that believes in no sudden changes and no catastrophes.
“A casual examination of the prophetic scriptures reveals there will be worldwide global catastrophes happening in association with the return of Christ. This generation only believes in a slow, peaceful, uniform transformation occurring over vast amounts of time.
“Notice the inspired words of the Apostle Peter as he concludes the above thought. Those scoffers give their ‘reason’ for rejecting prophetic preaching and the catastrophes associated with the return of Christ. The following statement is a definition of uniformitarianism given 2,000 years ago:
“History is replete with examples of local catastrophes. Those tragic events traced through human history have become the focus of many a study and geological research . .
MOUNT ST. HELEN’S—I well remember when Mount St. Helen’s erupted back on May 18, 1980. Some scientists, who were considered ‘in the know,’ to all who lived around the endangered area, gave ample warnings. Because of those warnings many were safely evacuated from the area. Almost everyone listened to the warnings and they were not harmed. Nevertheless, there were some die-hards, one of which was a certain Mr. Harry Truman, owner of a nearby Inn. He appeared on the national evening news each night for about a week before the eruption and refused to budge! He had lived in the shadow of that mountain for many decades. Since nothing had ever happened to that volcano in his lifetime, he dogmatically surmised that nothing ever would. He was like a committed uniformitarian. There were no such things as catastrophes in his thinking. But the eruption came on Sunday, May 18, 1980. Tragically, Mr. Truman perished, along with some others of like mind! That eruption, we later read, spewed enough volcanic ash into the atmosphere, to equal a ton of debris for every human alive on the planet at that time!
ATLANTIS—But how about the granddaddy of all the historical catastrophes (which are not mentioned in the Bible)? It is Plato who has left us a tale of woe of a certain people who were utterly destroyed by a catastrophe in less than two days. It was of such epic proportions that the masses of people of this past century and a half have had trouble digesting the thought it might have actually occurred, even though it was believed as historical until the 19th century. Of course I speak of the famed civilization known as Atlantis. Note the very words of Plato:
'In the two dialogues Timaeus and Critias Plato locates the empire ‘in front of the straits which are by you called the Pillars of Hercules (the Strait of Gibraltar).’ The entire area, which he describes as larger than all of Libya and Asia combined, is roughly the same as that we know now as the Middle East.’
[6] But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.’ (Gen. 2:5-6)
"That is the reason the New Testament says of Noah:
“No rain! Just what kind of myth is this? It is no myth at all, just a factual account of the pre-Flood days. The reason many readers of the Bible have such a difficult time discerning exactly what these Scriptures are telling us is that most of us have failed to grasp the clear declaration by the Scriptures that the PRE-FLOOD earth was vastly different from the POST-FLOOD earth. This is the reason for Peter’s words in the following passage:
[7] But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.’ (2 Peter 3: 6-7)
No comments:
Post a Comment