People today are wholly unaware of Chicago’s incredible legacy as the citadel
of Bible-believing fundamentalism in all of America.
“There was a great fundamentalist
movement in the late-1800s and early 1900s and then, in the ’40s and ’50s, the
leaders made a grave tactical mistake,” explains Jordan. “When you’re gaining
and learning and growing in life, if you ever reject it, you just stop dead where
you are.
“Someone in the 1940s wrote a
biography on Harry Ironside, who pastored Moody Church, and called him the
‘Archbishop of Fundamentalism.’ He was one of the premier leaders of the fundamentalist
movement, where they were standing for the Word of God; they were standing for
salvation by grace through faith and Pauline truth.
“In fact, if you read the books
Ironside wrote in the ’20s and ’30s, you’d think J.C. O’ Hair or C.R. Stam
wrote them. They were clear about Paul’s ministry; the difference between
prophecy and mystery, the law and grace and the Body of Christ and Israel.
“They understood those things and
that’s what our assembly came out of! Back in the ’40s, J.C. O’Hair warned the
fundamentalist camps, ‘You turn your back on the distinctive ministry of Paul
and God’s going to scourge fundamentalism with the rod of Pentecostal
fanaticism.’ That’s exactly what happened!
“Fundamentalism weakened itself into
what was called ‘New Evangelicalism,’ which is now just called Evangelicals,
which is sort of a watered-down version. That took place in the ’70s and ’80s
and the charismatics took over. Then you got the charismatic confusion in the
’80s and ’90s.
*****
“You know, we mentioned earlier
about contemporary Christian music. You know where contemporary Christian music
came from? It came from Chuck Smith at Calvary Chapel out in southern California.
That one ministry out there changed the whole tenor of evangelicalism.
“It introduced a style of music, a
style of worship, a style of church services, a style of activity, and now
fundamentalists, because they’re into ‘gain is godliness’ and so eager to have
the crowd of people. It’s, ‘You got to entertain people to get them in, and
getting them in is godliness.’
“Smith went out into the Pacific
Ocean and baptized a thousand ‘Jesus People’ in one weekend and everybody said,
‘Oh, God’s moving!’ Why? Because they thought ‘gain was godliness.’ How do you
get that way? Go read I Timothy 6. The first thing they did was turn away from
wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ for the ministry of
the Apostle Paul.
“Paul writes in I Timothy 6: 3-5,
‘If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words
of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;
[4] He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
[5] Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.’
[4] He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
[5] Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.’
“Listen, religion is designed for
the satisfaction and the lust of your flesh, focusing on emotions and
experiences. You go into great temples with their architecture, and the beauty
of the surroundings, and the music, and it satisfies the aesthetic values that
your heart has and wants to ascribe to. You take it all in and say, ‘Wow, this
is wonderful!’ and you feel humbled from it.
“It’s not just the formalism, but
there’s the jumping in the aisles and running the benches and everybody having
a hootenanny. Evangelicals moved into that and that’s taken over evangelicalism
today.
*****
“If you aren’t properly grounded in
Romans, what do you read about in the next two books, Corinthians and
Galatians? You know who the Corinthians were? They were man-centered; they were
the ancient charismatics of Paul’s day.
“The Galatians were Moses-centered.
They’re the Calvinists and the Reformed teachers of Paul’s day. They didn’t
have those titles back there but they were into the same activities; we just
have the modern manifestations.
“When you move from the charismatic
stuff, the next thing you go into, and this is what we have today, is a
resurgence of Calvinism.
“Did you know the largest Protestant
denomination in the world, the Southern Baptists, are now fighting for its life
over this issue?!
“You watch the great resurgent
movement; the call it the emerging church and the emergent church. It’s the
Bill Hybels (Willow Creek) and the Rick Warrens of the new generation. They’re
all basically Reformed people. You have Mark Driscoll and John Piper. These
guys are nuts when it comes to teaching the Bible; they’re all a bunch of
Reformed Calvinists. You need to know that.
“Everybody talking about Jesus isn’t
talking about the Jesus of the Bible. And even when they are talking about the
Jesus of the Bible, they aren’t talking about the ‘Jesus Christ, according to
the revelation of the mystery.’
“What that means to you practically
is, in Calvinism and in all this Reformed theology, the law is the standard by
which you’re to live your life.”
No comments:
Post a Comment